# Trismegistus 100-Turn Coherence Receipt

- Run: `tris_coherence_iter_20260621T150923Z`
- Count: `100`
- Passed checks: `436 / 436`
- Mean score: `1.0`
- Prompt spills: `0`
- Raw receipt spills: `0`

## What Was Tested

The run repeatedly probed Trismegistus across the same internal lanes:

- presence and simple coherence checks
- why `123` checks matter
- identity in context of Architect D and Trismegistus
- research and business partner framing
- receipt-boundary discipline
- Golden Field Lite bridge explanation
- Mirror Architecture and six field expert lanes
- OpenClaw / NemoClaw worker-gate language
- Telegram source-bridge behavior
- paid-work scouting with margin and approval discipline
- clarification behavior
- meta-improvement across longer runs

## Public-Safe Read

The architecture-on route held the active Tris identity, coherence-probe handling,
receipt boundary, Golden Field Lite bridge read, OpenClaw/NemoClaw gate language,
Telegram source-bridge policy, paid-work margin discipline, and clarification
behavior across the 100-turn internal eval.

## Boundary

This is an internal engineering eval and demo trace for context stability,
field-expert growth, source discipline, and mission coherence. It is not an
official SWE-bench, GAIA, or WebArena score.

## Next Gate

Run a larger 500-turn stability curve and stage official public benchmark slices
with the same-task baseline route versus architecture-on Tris route.